ABRASIVE TYPES and STRUCTURES

Superabrasives are defined by their extreme hardness and crystalline stability. Selecting the optimal grain type is essential to maintain structural integrity, control thermal generation, and maximize wheel utility during high-precision industrial processing.

ABRASIVES CHARACTERISTICS COMPARISON

From a materials‑engineering s tand point Diamond remains the hardest known abrasive, giving superior cutting efficiency.   While CBN, slightly less hard, provides significantly higher thermal stability, owing to its:

These distinctions make Diamond the preferred choice for non‑ferrous, carbide, and ceramic  materials, while CBN is the  optimal abrasive for hardened steels and high‑temperature alloys.
Both Diamond and CBN abrasive grains exhibit several critical  grain‑engineering
characteristics

Diamond Superabrasive (D)

Diamond superabrasives Tools offer an exceptional hardness, enabling superior precision, surface quality, and tool life. They are optimized for processing tungsten carbide, technical ceramics, sapphire, quartz, glass, and advanced composite materials. However, when applied to ferrous materials at high temperatures, carbon migration can accelerate tool wear, limiting their suitability for iron-based alloys.

  •  Extreme hardness: Knoop ~8000 HK
  •  High thermal stability up to 700°C
  •  Critical for non-ferrous and non-metal grinding

Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN)

The second hardest known material, offering immense thermal threshold stability (up to 1,400°C). Unlike diamond, CBN is highly inert to iron and oxidation. It is the premier choice for hardened tool steels, alloy steels, cast iron, and nickel-based superalloys, maintaining sharp cutting profiles without thermal degradation.

  •  Exceptional thermal stability up to 1400°C
  •  Chemically inert to iron-group metals
  •  Optimized for hardened steels and alloy components

CONVENTIONAL ALUMINA & SiC

Conventional Alumina and Silicon Carbide abrasives provide dependable grinding performance across diverse manufacturing environments. Engineered with durable macro-crystalline grain structures, these abrasives combine high material-removal rates, process reliability, and cost efficiency. They are widely used for machining iron-based alloys, cast iron, non-ferrous metals, composites, and other low-tensile-strength materials where robust cutting action and operational flexibility are required.

  •  High stock-removal capability for general-purpose grinding applications

  Versatile performance across ferrous, non-ferrous, and cast materials

  •  Cost-effective solution for roughing, surface grinding, and finishing operations
Diamond (DIA) vs. Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) – l Comparison Table

DIAMOND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE

Diamond Crystal Structure

C.B.N CRYSTAL STRUCTURE

Cubic Boron Nitride Crystal Structure

SILICON CARBIDE STRUCTURE

Silicon Carbide (SiC) crystal structure

ALUMINUM OXIDE STRUCTURE

Al₂O₃ (Aluminum Oxide) crystal structure
[MANUAL PDF LINK PLACEHOLDER – ADD FILE HERE]

ABRASIVE GRIT SIZES COMPRASION

Abrasive grit size defines particle size and impacts cutting, finish, and tool life.

FEPA, ANSI, and JIS standards classify grain sizes globally.

Diamond and CBN abrasive grit sizes are classified according to internationally recognized FEPA and ANSI standards, each employing a different grading methodology. The FEPA (Federation of European Producers of Abrasives) “D” and “B” standards define abrasive grain sizes based on precise micron ranges, ensuring consistent particle size distribution and process control. In contrast, the ANSI (American National Standards Institute) system classifies abrasives according to mesh size, which corresponds to the number of wire screen openings per linear inch. Understanding the relationship between these standards is essential when specifying superabrasive products, as equivalent grit designations may differ significantly between grading systems.

In technical grinding applications, understanding these core equivalencies is critical to predicting surface roughness (Ra) and material removal rates. This matrix outlines primary abrasive specifications commonly deployed across global high-tolerance manufacturing.

Grade Classification

FEPA (Europe)

ANSI (US)

Avg. Micron (µm)

Very Coarse

D1000

18

1000 µm

Coarse

D181

80

175 µm

Medium

D64

230

62 µm

Fine

D30

500

30 µm

Very Fine

D15

1200

15 µm

Ultra Fine

D5

3000

5 µm

DIAMOND FEPA STANDARD

C.B.N FEPA  STANDARD

US (ANSI MESH)

MEAN MICRON

D3

B3

5000

2-4 µm

D5

B5

3000

4-8 µm

D10

B10

1600

5-15 µm

D15

B15

1200

15-25 µm

D20

B20

1000

10-20 µm

D30

B30

500 / 600

25-32 µm

D35

B35

400 / 500

32-40 µm

D46

B46

325 / 400

38-45 µm

D54

B54

270 / 325

45-53 µm

D64

B64

230 / 270

53-64 µm

D76

B76

200 / 230

63-76 µm

D91

B91

170 / 200

75-90 µm

D107

B107

140 / 170

90-106 µm

D126

B126

120 / 140

106-125 µm

D151

B151

100 / 120

125-150 µm

D181

B181

80 / 100

150-180µm

D252

B252

60 / 80

212-250µm

D426

B426

40 / 45

355-425µm

D711

B711

25 / 30

600-710µm

D851

B851

20 / 25

710-850µm

D1001

B1001

18 / 20

850-1000µm

D1200

B

16/ 18

1200µm

SUPER ABRASIVES CONCENTRATION

Technical correlation matrix showing the standard relationship between concentration, volume percentage, and density.

formulating the guideline for Diamond & CBN wheel optimization.

Abrasive concentration is defined as the normalized volumetric loading of superabrasive grains within the working layer of a bonded diamond or CBN tool. Diamond concentration use the letter ‘C’,  C100 equals 4.4 ct/cm³ (25 vol.% abrasive phase), CBN concentrations use the letter ‘V’, V240, equals 24 vol.% abrasive volumebased
concentrations expressed in parts per thousand.
 Concentration selection determines active cutting edge frequency, inter-grain spacing, stress distribution within the bond matrix, thermal transport efficiency, grinding force characteristics, wheel wear kinetics, and process stability.

Concentration Impacts Wheel Wear

Abrasive concentration directly affects the number of active cutting grains available in the grinding zone.

Higher concentration generally decreases wheel wear by increasing cutting-point density and distributing grinding forces across more abrasive grains. Lower concentration increases grain loading, leading to accelerated abrasive and bond wear.

Concentration Affects Heat Dissipation

Abrasive concentration influences heat generation and heat transfer in two competing ways.

Concentration affects thermal behavior through a balance between cutting-point density and wheel porosity. Increasing concentration generally lowers heat generation per grain and improves thermal conductivity, while excessive concentration may restrict coolant flow and chip evacuation, potentially increasing grinding temperatures.

C.B.N CONCENTRATIONS

Concentration Code

Volume %

V60

6

V90

9

V120

12

V180

18

V240

24

V300

30

V360

36

DIAMOND CONCENTRATIONS

Concentration Code

Carats / cm³

Carats / in³

Primary Application Suitability

C25

6.25

1.1

Open grain structure for freer cutting action, lower grinding forces, and improved swarf evacuation.

C38

9.5

1.65

Open grain structure for freer cutting action, lower grinding forces, and improved swarf evacuation.

C50

12.5

2.08

Large contact areas, ultra-fine finishes, minimal thermal load.

C75

18.75

3.13

Standard wet grinding, general purpose tool room applications.

C100

25

4.17

Highly versatile default, optimal balance of lifetime and cut rate.

C125

31.25

5.22

Profile preservation, heavy cycle rates, narrow wheel profiles.

C150

37.55

6.26

High cutting-point density, exceptional profile retention, extended wheel life.

C175

43.75

7.7

Ultra-high grain density, maximum profile stability, exceptional wheel longevity.

Technical Documentation

Access complete specifications, dimensional drawings, and compliance materials. Click below to view the technical PDF directly in your browser.
[MANUAL PDF LINK – ADD FILE HERE]